People ask me what I think of James Gunn and Peter Safran's departure (firing) from the DCU. You got me. I'm no Nostradamus, let alone the Phantom Stranger or Sandman, but I suppose I can offer some reflections.
I mean, if Man of Tomorrow does hit big at the box office, Gunn's thread could continue. On the other hand, by the time Man of Tomorrow premieres, everyone under the sun will know Gunn and Safran have skipped town, which may give some cause to ignore a cinema visit to a saga that won't proceed. (Perhaps that's one of the reasons why The Flash and Aquaman 2 fizzled at theatres.)
I think DC (now as it stands in the Paramount/WB pool) should stick to exploratory pieces. If the movies should be one-shots, so be it. Clayface, for example, may be the most obvious case in point: an unintentional trendsetter, in that regard, though Matt Reeves' Batman continuation would go against that trend. Even so, its Serpico-steered content seems confined to its own noir-ish niche.
From my perspective, the necessity of shoehorning comic-book elements to build franchises (whether for DC or Marvel) has run its course, but the interest in superhero storytelling prevails. A passion for such modern, mythical adventures has existed for decades, whether on the page, the theatrical screen or television. It has no choice but to thrive. It's just a matter of how, and there's no shame in scaling it back, no matter who departs or takes charge.






































